Category Archives: collectivist

Amexit: Independence From Global Tyrants

“Powerful government always ignores the rights of the people.”

“The European Union is simply Hitlers plan as implimented by Albert Speer( Hitler’s economic minister) for a united europe.” – JBS CEO Arthur Thompson

 

After Brexit, U.S. Congressman Promotes Amexit from UN

 

Independence Day July 4, 1776, the original Brexit

Amexit: the American Sovereignty Restoration Act

 

 

 

‘Climate Astronauts’: Propaganda Aimed at Kids

 


“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”- Vladimir I. Lenin

Via: thepeoplescube.com

C’mon, komrades, you don’t have to be a Young Pioneer to follow these instructions, we are all children in the State’s eyes, and many are already compliant! I won’t be bathing, brushing my teeth, or leaving the house unless I am called upon for Revolutionary Activities, in which I just won’t bathe or brush. Lets make our government be out of this world!


Lyrics:

We are astronauts, and we can see
We are astronauts, what’s good for you
We are astronauts, no plastic bags
We are astronauts, don’t waste the food
We are astronauts, turn out the lights
We are astronauts, in the night
We are astronauts, don’t need no cars
We are astronauts, we go by bike

We are climate, climate astronauts
We are climate, climate astronauts

[…]

Boys and girls around the world
Can you hear us
We are loud
We don’t need no CO2
What we need is me and you
And, our solar rockets
We rocket, rocket

We are astronauts, we plant the trees
We are astronauts, we go by feet
We are astronauts, we save the world
We are astronauts, when we brush our teeth
We are astronauts, don’t need no bath
We are astronauts, at every day
We are astronauts, we love you earth
We are astronauts, and we will say

We are climate, climate astronauts

[…]

 

IN A FEW YEARS MEET:

WORSHIP ‘BIG BROTHER’ ?   YEAH RIGHT!

 

 

 

 

Elbert Guillory: “Why I Am a Republican”

 

Louisiana Senator Elbert Guillory (R-Opelousas) explains why he recently switched from the Democrat Party to the Republican Party.

 

 

Transcript:

“Hello, my name is Elbert Lee Guillory, and I’m the senator for the twenty-fourth district right here in beautiful Louisiana. Recently I made what many are referring to as a ‘bold decision’ to switch my party affiliation to the Republican Party. I wanted to take a moment to explain why I became a Republican, and also to explain why I don’t think it was a bold decision at all. It is the right decision — not only for me — but for all my brothers and sisters in the black community.

 

 

You see, in recent history the Democrat Party has created the illusion that their agenda and their policies are what’s best for black people. Somehow it’s been forgotten that the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an abolitionist movement with one simple creed: that slavery is a violation of the rights of man.

Frederick Douglass called Republicans the ‘Party of freedom and progress,’ and the first Republican president was Abraham Lincoln, the author of the Emancipation Proclamation. It was the Republicans in Congress who authored the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments giving former slaves citizenship, voting rights, and due process of law.

The Democrats on the other hand were the Party of Jim Crow. It was Democrats who defended the rights of slave owners. It was the Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who championed the Civil Rights Act of 1957, but it was Democrats in the Senate who filibustered the bill.

You see, at the heart of liberalism is the idea that only a great and powerful big government can be the benefactor of social justice for all Americans. But the left is only concerned with one thing — control. And they disguise this control as charity. Programs such as welfare, food stamps, these programs aren’t designed to lift black Americans out of poverty, they were always intended as a mechanism for politicians to control black the black community.

The idea that blacks, or anyone for that matter, need the the government to get ahead in life is despicable. And even more important, this idea is a failure. Our communities are just as poor as they’ve  always been. Our schools continue to fail children. Our prisons are filled with young black men who should be at home being fathers. Our self-initiative and our self-reliance have been sacrificed in exchange for allegiance to our overseers who control us by making us dependent on them.

Sometimes I wonder if the word freedom is tossed around so frequently in our society that it has become a cliché.

The idea of freedom is complex and it is all-encompassing. It’s the idea that the economy must remain free of government persuasion. It’s the idea that the press must operate without government intrusion. And it’s the idea that the emails and phone records of Americans should remain free from government search and seizure. It’s the idea that parents must be the decision makers in regards to their children’s education — not some government bureaucrat.

But most importantly, it is the idea that the individual must be free to pursue his or her own happiness free from government dependence and free from government control. Because to be truly free is to be reliant on no one other than the author of our destiny. These are the ideas at the core of the Republican Party, and it is why I am a Republican.

So my brothers and sisters of the American community, please join with me today in abandoning the government plantation and the Party of disappointment. So that we may all echo the words of one Republican leader who famously said, ‘free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, we are free at last.’

 

 

 

Planned Obsolescence: Engineered To Fail

 

 

“Planned obsolescence or built-in obsolescence in industrial design and economics is a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life, so it will become obsolete, that is, unfashionable or no longer functional after a certain period of time. The rationale behind the strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases (referred to as “shortening the replacement cycle”).”    wikipedia

 

“Planned obsolescence tends to work best when a producer has at least an oligopoly.”  wikipedia

 In 1932 with Bernard London‘s pamphlet Ending the Depression Through Planned Obsolescence:

“An equally important advantage of a system of planned obsolescence would be its function in providing a new reservoir from which to draw income for the operation of the Government.”

 “My proposal would put the entire country on the road to recovery, and eventually restore normal employment conditions and sound prosperity. My suggested remedy would provide a permanent source of income for the Federal Government and would relieve it for all time of the difficulties of balancing its budget. Briefly stated, the essence of my plan for accomplishing these much-to-be-desired-ends is to chart the obsolesce of capital and consumption goods at the time of their production. I would have the Government assign a lease of life to shoes and homes and machines, to all products of manufacture, mining and agriculture, when they are first created, and they would be sold and used within the term of their existence definitely known by the consumer. After the allotted time had expired, these things would be legally “dead” and would be controlled by the duly appointed governmental agency and destroyed if there is widespread unemployment. New products would constantly be pouring forth from the factories and marketplaces, to take the place of the obsolete, and the wheels of industry would be kept going and employment regularized and assured for the masses.” 

 

 

 

 

Engineered to fail: a strategy of people control

 

The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy

 

ebook preview: Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America

 

 

 

 

 

Beware Of The Neocons: The Illusion Of ‘Conservative’

 

The term “neoconservative” refers to those who made the ideological journey from the anti-Stalinist Left to the camp of American conservatism.   (wikipedia)

 

 

neocon-watch

 

 

 

 

Oil Cartel: Competition Is A Sin

Via: corbettreport

 

COMPETITION IS A SIN

When asked how he could justify the treachery and deceit with which he pursued the creation of the Standard Oil monopoly, John D. Rockefeller is reputed to have said: “Competition is a sin.” This is the mentality of the monopolist, and it is this justification, framed as religious conviction, that drove the oiligarchs to so ruthlessly eliminate anyone who would dare rise up as a pretender to their throne.

 

read the full transcript

 

 

 

 

We are swimming in oil

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obamatrade: Global Government Tyranny Masquerades as a Trade Agreement

 

“Give us a protective tariff, and we will have the greatest nation on earth.”   Abraham Lincoln

 

 

America became prosperous by protecting American entrepreneurs from  attacks by enemy governments and their favored business companies.

A subsidy is a “gift” or “grant” of the peoples money by government to a ‘privileged’ few.

America’s trade deficit with China, Japan, Korea, the European Union and rest of the world means that we are transferring huge amounts of our national wealth to other countries. In effect, Americans are being forced to subsidize the economic agendas of  foreigners.

“Overall, the United States has accumulated a total trade deficit with the rest of the world of more than 8 trillion dollars since 1975.” (source)

Thanks to Donald Trump calling the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement:’Insanity’, the globalists weapon deceptively called “free trade” is a topic of the presidential election.

 

Americans have been duped by NAFTA, GATT and are currently being sold into slavery by the Trans Pacific Partnership

 

 

“In 1955, free-trade advocate Dr. Lewis E. Lloyd wrote a book on how eight conditions must be met to have free and fair trade. What he discovered changed his view of free trade, especially in regard to free trade agreements and the welfare of America. Are you in favor of merging America with other countries?”  (source)

 

Deceptive label of ‘free trade’ is un American 

Promises of ‘free trade’ prosperity for Americans are lies

British Opium Trade Monopoly: A Lesson In ‘Free trade’

 

 

 

 

Globalist Agenda: After America – North America The Merger

 

Obama can play ‘dumb’ about the integration of The United States with Mexico and Canada because the globalist agenda to create a regional government called the North American Union is going on without media coverage. Highways are being built, open border policies are in place, and financial policies are enforcing banking and economic strangleholds on every aspect of  your life. Each manufactured ‘crisis’ will be used as an opportunity to ‘harmonize‘ America’s independence and sovereignty into the globalist’s control until, like the European Union, we will be a tyrannical police state.

 

 

 

After America Comes North America

Obama Presses ‘North American Union’

Dangers Of A North American Union

NAFTA Superhighway

 

 

 

 

 

The Impact of Science on Society: Bertrand Russell

“Life is nothing but a competition to be the criminal rather than the victim.” – Bertrand Russell

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology … Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education.’ Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part … It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship … The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black.

… the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.”  (pg 40)

 

 

“Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy … It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished … Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible …

“The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia … If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilised. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method …

Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.”  (pgs 49,50)

“After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.”   (pg 54)

“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s. However, I am wandering from the question of stability, to which I must return.

There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority. All these methods have been practiced: the first, for example, by the Australian aborigines; the second by the Aztecs, the Spartans, and the rulers of Plato’s Republic; the third in the world as some Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia … Of these three, only birth control avoids extreme cruelty and unhappiness for the majority of human beings. Meanwhile, so long as there is not a single world government there will be competition for power among the different nations. And as increase of population brings the threat of famine, national power will become more and more obviously the only way of avoiding starvation. There will therefore be blocs in which the hungry nations band together against those that are well fed. That is the explanation of the victory of communism in China.” (pgs 103,104)

“The need for a world government, if the population problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on Darwinian principles.”  (pg 105)

“A society is not stable unless it is on the whole satisfactory to the holders of power and the holders of power are not exposed to the risk of successful revolution.”  (pg 110)

“First, as regards physical conditions. Soil and raw materials must not be used up so fast that scientific progress cannot continually make good the loss by means of new inventions and discoveries … If raw materials are not to be used up too fast, there must not be free competition for their acquisition and use but an international authority to ration them in – such quantities as may from time to time seem compatible with continued industrial prosperity. And similar considerations apply to soil conservation.

Second, as regards population … To deal with this problem it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling.”  (pgs 110, 111)

 

ebook preview: The impact of Science on Society

ebook preview: The Scientific Outlook – Bertrand Russell

CHAPTER XV

EDUCATION IN A SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY

“EDUCATION has two purposes: on the one hand to form the mind, on the other hand to train the citizen. The Athenians concentrated on the former, the Spartans on the latter. The Spartans won, but the Athenians were remembered.

Education in a scientific society may, I think, be best conceived after the analogy of the education provided by the Jesuits. The Jesuits provided one sort of education for the boys who were to become ordinary men of the world, and another for those who were to become members of the Society of Jesus. In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play. Children will be educated from their earliest years in the manner which is found least likely to produce complexes.”

 

 

Duopoly of Republicans and Democrats Gives The Illusion of Choice

We Americans are being attacked by a ‘Divide and Conquer Strategy‘.

We have a two party system that, at the top, pursues a shared  globalist agenda. So, good people in each party will support this party. But, when an important agenda item must be passed. The party leadership will betray their constituents to achieve their goal. Often working with the leadership of the “opposition” party.

Example:

Did you know the Republican Party was founded by radicals to pursue a radical agenda?

Red Republicans and Lincolns’ Marxists

Remember the trade legislation: NAFTA and GATT.

Championed by Bill Clinton working with the Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.

Remember President Eisenhower. A lot of Republicans wore the button “I Like Ike” without realizing that Ike was a democrat who  praised FDR. The Republican leadership betrayed good members of the party who supported Taft  because Taft opposed the Republican leaderships Globalist agenda.  So, They engineered  Ikes switch to the Republicans and thus deny Taft the nomination..

 

Remember Richard Nixon, The Anti- Communist?

Who Better to open China and pave the way for the creation of a powerful enemy and a hollowing out of the American economy. Who would  suspect an anti-communist to so powerfully aid the Communist Chinese.

Remember Obama’s birth certificate, draft card, passport, citizenship, ect. Scandals.

It was “Team Obama” in the controlled opposition that made his election possible. The Republican leadership ignored good party members concerns. Fox news, Rush Limbaugh and a large cast of establishment approved media  filtered, censored, and downright fabricated the impression that these concerns had been addressed.

“Team Obamas” most important members are the ones the public perceives as opposing him. Look close at people and organizations who proclaim their support for your values but advance an unamerican agenda.

Rush Limbaugh was for the bailout of the Mexican Peso. He was for NAFTA and GATT, Free Trade outsourcing of jobs and the betrayal of  the American economy.

He supported the neo-con agenda with all its wars, war on terror, and giving a pass to bankers and criminals in corporations. No callers to his show can discuss JFKs murder, Waco, the Oklahoma City bombing , 911, Boston bombing evidence, witnesses or ideas that are outside of the establishment medias approved boundaries. Millions of good Americans end up supporting un-American ideas because of Rush.

Fox news is definitely an important member of  ”Team Obama”.

Why were Judge  Napolitano  and Glenn Beck let go from Fox? Replaced by who? Geraldo? Juan Williams? Bill O’Reilly?

 

Tyranny uses techniques of deception

State Of The Union 2014: Bush Speechwriter: Obama Plagiarized Bush