cui bono? Who benefits from America involved in a Syrian war?
Not America! But a Cabal of evil agenda pushing ‘Globalists’ intend to use the Syria Problem and the propaganda media’s reaction to impose a solution of tyranny, taxes and war. PROBLEM-REACTION- SOLUTION. And at the same time, the globalists can blame President Trump for everything. A twofer
Globalist foreign policy of America as a policeman of the world has, once again, escalated the chance of starting World War 3. Notice all of the globalist politicians and media applauding the attack on Syria.
911, The Gulf Of Tonkin, the Oklahoma City Bombing, and a long list of FALSE FLAG events are always the excuse to start a war or tax us to death, impose police state tyranny and take away our civil rights.
Who used poison gas in Syria? Rebels or Assad? Globalist backed rebels and their Globalist masters look to win big.
Joel Skousen comments on Syrian gas attack at 17:45
Sadly, the motion was approved. As was the later Sanctuary City status designation.
If you believe these office holders are breaking the law and should be held accountable, you are not alone. There are millions of us who are ‘invisible’ to the corrupt, agenda driven, globalist propaganda media outlets. Listen to people in Los Angeles speak their minds.
You will not see these people on CNN, Fox News, ABC, CBS or MSNBC.
Josh Tolley interviews a woman from Missouri who says refugees are flown in at night and given Social Security numbers and passports upon arrival. She said they come in unvetted and, in some cases, carrying serious diseases.
Many refugees come in with tuberculosis, leprosy, HIV, giardia, smallpox, polio and other communicable diseases, some, highly contagious.
“When my people do a crime, they get three strikes, your people do a crime, they get amnesty”
Black Trump Supporter Blasts Sanctuary Cities: “All the Jobs Are Going to Illegals!
by Paul Joseph Watson
Video footage from a town hall meeting shows an African-American Trump supporter passionately slamming sanctuary cities as a racist assault on the black community.
“Sanctuary cities are racist – black communities have been destroyed by illegal immigration,” says the woman, adding that the situation called for a “second civil rights movement.”
Tracing her ancestry back to slave ships, the woman said, “I’m not going anywhere….sanctuary cities are racist, all the jobs are going to illegals….that is wrong, you’re not going to be allowed to get away with it….the black community has been destroyed by racist illegal immigration and we’re not gonna have it.”
“When my people do a crime, they get three strikes, your people do a crime, they get amnesty, they get benefits and they’re not paying taxes,” she added.
“Thank God for Trump, thank God for Sessions and you should be ashamed of yourselves, how dare you?” roared the woman, questioning why illegals were allowed to claim benefits for people living back in Mexico, while her own family members struggled in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
Trump has threatened to cut off federal funds to so-called “sanctuary cities” that prevent law enforcement from apprehending illegal aliens. Polls show that 56 per cent of Hispanics support Trump’s policy of deporting illegal immigrants with criminal records.
PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
♦ Section 1. Purpose. The visa-issuance process plays a crucial role in detecting individuals with terrorist ties and stopping them from entering the United States. Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans. And while the visa-issuance process was reviewed and amended after the September 11 attacks to better detect would-be terrorists from receiving visas, these measures did not stop attacks by foreign nationals who were admitted to the United States.
Numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving visitor, student, or employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee resettlement program.
Deteriorating conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster, and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use any means possible to enter the United States. The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.
In order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.
♦ Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and to prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.
“By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.
On the issues I care about as a Muslim, the “Women’s March,” unfortunately, has taken a stand on the side of partisan politics that has obfuscated the issues of Islamic extremism over the eight years of the Obama administration. “Women’s March” partners include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has not only deflected on issues of Islamic extremism post-9/11, but opposes Muslim reforms that would allow women to be prayer leaders and pray in the front of mosques, without wearing headscarves as symbols of chastity. Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an “anti-Muslim extremist” in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its “anti-Muslim extremists” report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)
Fifteen years after the events of 911, the ‘War on Terror” is turning the world into a global police state. ‘Fake News’, that is tailored to manipulate the public, is the key element in the process of changing America from an independent nation, with a Constitutional Republican form of government, to a region, merged with Canada and Mexico, in a tyrannical world government.
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski (USAF ret.) from her monograph 911 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol. 1, 2006 :
“I have been told by reporters that they will not report their own insights or contrary evaluations of the official 911 story, because to question the government story about 911 is to question the very foundation of our entire modern belief system regarding our government, our country, and our way of life. To be charged with questioning these foundations is far more serious than being labeled a disgruntled conspiracy nut or anti-government traitor, or even being sidelined or marginalized within an academic, government service, or literary career. To question the official 911 story is simply and fundamentally revolutionary. In this way, of course, questioning the official story is also simply and fundamentally American.”