Clinton Charity Fraud? Do Globalists Fleece the World by Pretending to be Philanthropists?

“If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”   –  Émile Zola

Charles Ortel:

“State, federal, and foreign laws bar public charities from being run for private gain in interstate commerce—which means, by using the mail, telephones or the internet. The Clinton Foundation’s complex operations (it is not just one entity but a web of them) do not comply with this requirement. Nor does the Clinton Foundation ever seem to have submitted its financial records to an independent, properly certified audit by a qualified accounting firm.
Overall I consider the Clinton Foundation to be a charity fraud network. I base this conclusion on my review of extensive data about its operations including the activities of the Clinton family and their friends in Haiti, a nation that has suffered many disasters, both natural and manmade.
What possesses powerful, wealthy, and educated persons to prey on the most desperately poor humans on earth as they posture as “philanthropists”?  And why has there been no government oversight?”

A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.

 

Your Constitution is an iron clad contract, enforceable in a court of law – Carl Miller

No state may convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it. – Carl Miller

 

 

Marbury v. Madison : 5 US 137 (1803):
“No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect,” “Anything that is in conflict is null and void of law”, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme Law would be the basis of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”

(If any statement, within any law, which is passed, is unconstitutional, the whole law is unconstitutional.)

History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people, against invasion by the Federal Government.”– Bell v. Hood, 71 F. Supp., 813, 816 (1947)  U.S.D.C., So. Dist. CA.

U.S. Supreme Court Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943):  A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803): a law repugnant to the Constitution is void

KNOW YOUR CONSTITUTION: IF YOU DONT KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, YOU DON’T HAVE ANY RIGHTS!

The Memorandum: Defendant’s revenues are exempt from federal excise taxation because the activity is the exercise of a fundamental, constitutionally protected right, and, therefore, outside the taxing authority of the federal government 

 

 

 

Whistleblower Black Ops Contractor Exposes False Flag Operations

“For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.”  Luke 8:17

Who is Cody Snodgres?  A new whistleblower? 

When I hear a new whistleblower I consider what he says. Does it square with information I already have? This man has a lot of information. Often, you must seize the moment before new information disappears forever.  I listen and do an analysis.

I will continue to investigate and and consider new info.

Consider this!

HOW TO ANALYZE THE NEWS AND WHAT GOES ON AROUND YOU

NO MORE FAKE NEWS

 

 

Pearl Harbor: Treason Leads to World War 2

Charles Lindbergh pleads for independence

Via: jamesperloff.com

PEARL HARBOR: ROOSEVELT’S 9/11

False flags do not stand alone. They are better understood – and more credibly explained to skeptics – when seen in history’s context.

 

On the morning of December 7, 1941, Japanese planes, launched from aircraft carriers, attacked the American fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, sinking or heavily damaging 18 ships (including eight battleships), destroying 188 planes, and leaving over 2,000 servicemen killed.

The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt denounced this “day of infamy” before Congress, from whom he secured an avid declaration of war.

 

 

Up until then, however, Americans had overwhelmingly opposed involvement in World War II. They had been thoroughly disillusioned by the First World War:

  • although they had been told they would be fighting for “democracy” in that previous war, taxpayers learned from the postwar Graham Committee of Congress that they’d been defrauded out of some $6 billion in armaments that were never manufactured or delivered1;
  • atrocity tales about German soldiers (such as cutting the hands off thousands of Belgian children) had turned out to be fabrications;
  • the sinking of the Lusitania – the central provocation that ultimately led to the U.S. declaration of war – had been committed by Germany not to kill women and children (as propaganda claimed), but to prevent tens of tons of war munitions from reaching the European front. (Click here for a debunking of the Lusitania myth.)

Read the full Article

WWII Propaganda Films

 

 

BOMBSHELL NEWS: Sandy Hook Researcher Prevails in Lawsuit

BOMBSHELL NEWS. SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig Prevails in Lawsuit Filed by Alias “Leonard Pozner”

Where is the media? They are covering Matt Lauer 24/7.

Wolfgang is a man on a mission to expose the cover up of Sandy Hook. He is a whistleblower who asked basic questions and got threatened, bullied and slandered. He is still standing.

I want the authorities to answer Wolfgang’s questions, because my questions about Sandy Hook have not been answered. Ask the questions, demand answers, not cover ups. God bless you Wolfgang.

Fake-father Lenny Pozner withdrew his claim

SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig Prevails in Lawsuit Filed by Alias “Leonard Pozner”

Hartford Courant: Editorial: Release The Sandy Hook Report

 

 

Drones: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times”

 livescience.com:

Drones, also called unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have no human pilot onboard, and instead are either controlled by a person on the ground or autonomously via a computer program. These stealth craft are becoming increasingly popular, not just for war and military purposes, but also for everything from wildlife and atmospheric research to disaster relief and sports photography. Drones are becoming the eyes and ears of scientists by surveying the ground for archaeological sites, signs of illegal hunting and crop damage, and even zipping inside hurricanes to study the wild storms. You can even rent a personal drone to soar above the horizon and snap a photo or video.

Read the full article

If You Boycott Israel ‘Big Brother’ Says: No Soup For You!

‘Big Brother’ is watching what you think. If you are not ‘politically correct’ ‘Big Brother’, like the soup Nazi from Seinfeld, will say: NO SOUP FOR YOU!                          

 

Texas legislature enacts a bill:

PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTS WITH COMPANIES BOYCOTTING ISRAEL

 

Propaganda Media’s Denial of Shots Fired at Other Casinos

Skousen: Shots Fired at Other Vegas Hotels — “Ample Evidence”

Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief :

“Shots fired at other hotels: Perhaps the most difficult thing to understand about this entire affair is the complete denial of the media that there were other shots fired in other casinos. I can see why the FBI would want to cover up the fact that there were at least two other shooters attacking the crowds at the parking lot festival (to promote the lone shooter claim), but how could they think to cover up multiple shootings at multiple hotels in Las Vegas, with hundreds of witnesses? But that’s what is happening. “

Read the full article

Kymberley Suchomel describes: There Were Multiple Ground Level Shooters In Crowd

 

 

Another ‘False Flag’:What happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas

Joel Skousen in his latest edition of World Affairs Brief addressed the Las Vegas False Flag event:

“All of the modern high profile mass shootings of innocent people at schools, movie theaters or concerts have been engineered by government black operations, either using controlled terrorists, mercenaries or unstable youths under the influence of mood altering drugs and hypnosis. Even the most hardened criminals don’t use automatic weapons to shoot hundreds of people. When I first saw the profile of Stephen Paddock, the claimed shooter already dead in the 32nd floor Mandalay Bay suite, surrounded by dozens of weapons and spent shell casings, I suspected this was a patsy in a setup. According to his brother, Stephen was just a normal guy with a few guns and no religious or political fervor at all. But as the evidence poured in and the guns were traced to his recent purchases, it seems evident that Paddock was involved, though he couldn’t have been the only shooter. Multiple witnesses and video showed the telltale flashing signature of an automatic weapon coming from the mid, to lower half of the tower. Another video surfaced of a security guard opening up on the crowd down at ground level around gate 7. And then there was the Hispanic woman with obvious advance warning who was warning or taunting a women in line prior to the venue that “you’re all going to die.” This week, I’ll walk you through all the evidence so far, including crucial weapons analysis.”

Read the full article

Image result for criminals obey gun laws like politicians follow their oaths of office

 

 

Skousen: Las Vegas Mass Shooting—Detailed Analysis

Eerie Predictions in Vegas… Cui Bono?